9/12/2010

Fun Idea + Review!

Tonight, I was thinking of something to watch. I have been a bit depressed so I wasn't really feeling something romantic or funny. Then I remembered that I have a 720p copy of the film Inside. Now, I've been told this is a horrifying and traumatic film and if you have read any of my earlier posts, you know that that means I have to watch it. So, I came up with this little idea: What if I just shared my thoughts about it beforehand, then talk about it immediately after I watch it?

Inside (Julien Maury, Alexandre Bustillo, 2007)

Beforehand Thoughts:
Right now, I feel exactly like I did when I was told to watch the film Martyrs. Pretty nervous, but excited. I haven't read what Inside is about or anything like that. All I know is that it is part of a "French New Wave Horror Gore Blood Fest" genre (or something like that). The cover of the film has the imprint of a child on the mothers womb and a pair of scissors so I should probably be ready for some intensely grotesque violence. Maybe even a self-administered abortion. Who knows what those crafty French are up to these days...

The last film I watched in 720p was [REC], and that alone was terrifying in High-Def. So, lets see how this is...




Post-Trauma:
Well... That was... Hmm... So, I was bracing for it to be a lot more visually terrifying than it was. As far as blood and gore goes, it has a ton. There is an overwhelming amount of violence, but with these films, I expect nothing less.

The plot for Inside is like this: A pregnant woman is driving and gets in a car accident and her husband dies. 4 months later, the night before she is going to be induced into labor, she is terrorized by a psychotic woman who wants her child.

For some reason, when I watched this, I was expecting a bit more Rosemary's Baby and less "Dr. 90210," so I was letting myself get far more frightened than I should have. This is basically your stereotypical slasher film, but with the violence turned up to "Ultra" and less scantily clad co-eds being slaughtered. I mean, it's fairly predictable. But here is my rant about slasher films, why are the characters absolutely brainless? Sure, in a situation like that, you may make some bad decisions spur of the moment, but I think we have all played enough video games to know that if you have a gun, and someone is stalking you, you hold up in a small room with the door open and shoot whatever steps in front. But the protagonist of this film doesn't think like that; no traditional logic. She is more the
So there is someone coming to kill me. Do I:
A) Hold up in a bathroom, lock the door and ONLY open it when I am 100% positive of my safety?
B) Peek out every now and then, vapidly fighting back when attacked, getting my shit rocked, only to retreat right back to where I started?
C) Find a sharp object and take that ho-bag on while yelling, "COME AT ME, BRO!"?
D) Walk out and let her have her way with me? I'm gonna die someday, why not make it now?


Traditional logic says A and if you are a Viking or a Bear, C. But for some reason, she says, "B sounds like a great plan! You can never be covered in enough of your own blood! And really, who needs extremities? So I lose use of my ankle or my hand, whatever!"

Ugh, it's beyond me.

★★★½ - The good thing about films like Inside, High Tension and Martyrs is that, usually, they are really well shot. It makes the gore look a lot more elegant (if that makes any sense). At some point, it ceases to look like a snuff film and it looks more like an artsy gore film, which is essentially what it is. If you are into the tense, ultraviolent horror film, I'd say this was pretty decent. I liked the concept behind Martyrs a lot more than this (both fall into this same French pretty/ultraviolent genre). But, besides the stupidity of the protagonist, it's a pretty cool little film. Prepare yourself for a LOT of blood.



Funny story, while writing this I have been listening to the song "Bloodrocuted" by Dethklok. It seems to fit well.

9/11/2010

Vintage Dames pt. 2

I haven't updated this in a while and, honestly, for no reason other than I'm lazy. I started a few posts but then just deleted them because I felt... I don't know... Apathetic? I kind of feel like doing this is really trivial. Oh well, so long as someone watches any of the films I have recommended, I think I'll be happier about this. So, if you watch one, please email me (Kevinopatrick@gmail.com) or let me know in the comments or something.

Without further ado, Audrey Hepburn:

Sabrina (Billy Wilder, 1954)

It was only after I had a conversation with my dad about amazing directors that I learned that this was made by Billy Wilder. Just to give you a perspective of how AMAZING Billy Wilder is, here is his directorial resumé:
-Double Indemnity (1944): I'm going to do a post about this film when I do my Film Noir post.

-Sunset Boulevard (1950)

-The Seven Year Itch (1955)

-Some Like It Hot (1959)

-The Apartment (1960)

The four films in bold above are in the American Film Institute's Top 100 Films of the 20th Century. I just wanted to get that out of the way. If you are looking for some awesome older films to watch, any Billy Wilder film should suit your fancy.

Sabrina is a wonderful romantic comedy about a young mechanics daughter who lives on the estate of the incredibly wealthy Larrabee family. Since she was young, Sabrina (Audrey Hepburn (Breakfast at Tiffany's, Wait Until Dark, and Roman Holiday)) has been in love with the skirt-chaser Thomas Larrabee (William Holden (Sunset Boulevard, Golden Boy, and The Wild Bunch)) but Thomas has always turn a blind eye to her charms. But when Sabrina is sent off to a cooking school in Paris, France, she comes back a changed girl, and even more gorgeous than the day she left.
Also in this film as Thomas' workaholic brother, Linus, is Humphrey Bogart (Casablanca, The Maltese Falcon, and Treasure of the Sierra Madre).

If you're not convinced that this film is amazing based on those three people alone, then... I guess... you'll just have to keep reading. Or something...

Audrey Hepburn is just adorable. Let's be honest. Many believe she is the most attractive woman to ever live (personally, I think Ingrid Bergman gives her a run for her money, but I have friends who will fight me over that. Them be fightin' words!). But her charming personality really just pours out of this character. Match that with the narcissist the Holden plays and the ever wonderful Humphrey Bogart and you have an incredible film. Bogart does an incredible job as the man who knows nothing other than work. He dresses nicely on every occasion and really doesn't know how to live. But leave it to Audrey Hepburn to change that.

★★★★½ - Just watch this. I may not be the best at eloquently getting my thoughts out, but just trust me on this, it's a great film. There was a remake with Harrison Ford and Greg Kinnear but if it doesn't have Audrey, there really isn't a point in watching it. She adds such a huge dynamic to this. She's irreplaceable.

































Roll credits.